Katy writes

"So when Obama and HIS administration blamed it on a video, supposedly the best intelligence in the world, they had reason."

Yeah... the reason being that there were dozens of other attacks in the same place at the same time at it seemed entirely likely that this one was related to the others

Katy writes

" But you back them for doing so? Why? Either their intelligence is not as good as it needs to be or they lied. Talk about jumping to conclusion...It was not just the day of or even a few days after. They let that conclusion ride for a little while"

Exactly when did YOU know that this attack wasnt related to the others,and what proof do you cite to support that view?

I'm not "backing anyone " Katy. Interested in facts as opposed to unsubstantiated hate driven conspiracy theories . Intelligence in the midst of an attack is almost always confusing, contradicting and full of supposition. Often the people BEING attacked are the ones supplying the info how, exactly are they to determine who is attacking them , and even more difficult "why" they are being attacked ?

Does it really matter if it was due to a video or just because they are murderous idiots? How do you know that one or more of the attackers wasnt attacking in retaliation to the video? More importantly , what difference does it make?

Further as more "intelligence" came to light it was immediately released to correct the previous erroneous assumptions...So where is your issue?

I remember the initial reports on 9/11 were all over the place, the "why did they do it " question still remains unanswered . How can anyone be expected to know "why" these idiots do what they do ?


Katy writes
" "Katy , Kind of you to admit your original quote was driven by "blind hatred" as opposed to fact ." As you know, I did not admit anything to the like. I still say Obama and his administration put it out there.

Your opinion is noted , yet it remains only a matter of opinion Katy. I do appreciate the video you posted and will give you credit for finally supplying an actual quote in support of your opinion .Though I still dont have a clue where the "scandal " is .

Incorrect speculation as to the inner workings of a group of terrorists? Followed by a correction when more facts come to light...Yeah, having a hard time hanging anyone over that